In software development, verification and validation are two essential processes that ensure the quality and usefulness of the end product.
Verification means checking that what was implemented follows the necessary requirements, making sure that the development team is building the product correctly.
Validation, on the other hand, means confirming that what was implemented really does what stakeholders or users wanted, ensuring that the team is building the right product.
What Is Verification Testing?
Verification testing answers the question: "Are we building the product right?" It checks that the software is being developed in accordance with its specifications.
Common verification techniques include:
Requirements Reviews
Analyzing requirements for clarity, completeness, and feasibility. This often involves techniques like peer reviews, checklist analysis, and creating traceability matrices to map requirements to downstream artifacts.
Design Reviews
Evaluating proposed designs against requirements to verify the design is suitable. This can involve techniques like design walkthroughs, where the design is explained step-by-step to reviewers, and design inspections, where reviewers individually examine the design artifacts and then discuss their findings.
Code Walkthroughs
Systematically reviewing code to verify quality and adherence to standards. This can involve techniques like step-through debugging, where the code is traced line-by-line to verify its logic, and scenario-based reviews, where the code is reviewed against specific use cases.
Unit Testing
Tests individual components or units of code to verify that each unit performs as intended. For example, a unit test for a login function would verify that it returns the correct output for valid and invalid login attempts.
Code Inspections
Formally examining code to detect defects and verify compliance with specifications. This often uses techniques like Fagan inspections, which involve a structured, multi-stage process of individual reviews, group discussions, and rework.
What Is Validation Testing?
Validation testing evaluates whether a software product satisfies the needs of its intended users. It answers the critical question: "Are we building the right product?"
Some common examples of validation testing techniques include:
Integration Testing
Validates that different units or components work together correctly when integrated. For instance, integration testing would validate that the login function correctly interacts with the user database and session management components.
System Testing
Verifies that the complete, integrated software system meets user needs. This involves testing the software in a complete, realistic environment, validating that it performs as expected under real-world conditions. System testing typically includes:
- User Testing: Ensures that the software meets user expectations and workflows by conducting usability tests and gathering feedback from real users. This validates that the system is intuitive, functional, and aligns with user needs.
- Accessibility Testing: Confirms the software is inclusive and adheres to accessibility standards (such as WCAG), making it usable for individuals with disabilities. This includes testing screen reader compatibility, keyboard navigation, and color contrast.
- Performance Testing: Evaluates how the system handles expected and peak loads, including stress and load testing, to ensure stability, responsiveness, and scalability under varying conditions.
- Security Testing: Identifies vulnerabilities and ensures that the software is protected against threats like unauthorized access, data breaches, and malicious attacks, safeguarding user and organizational data.
These facets of system testing provide a comprehensive assessment, ensuring the software is robust, reliable, and ready for deployment.
You may also like: Quality Assurance in Software Development: The Key to a Great Software Product
Differences Between Verification and Validation Testing
The major differences between verification and validation testing can be seen when analyzing the objective, focus, timing, and techniques used for each testing type.
Objectives
Verification and validation testing are both essential quality assurance measures, but they have different objectives. Verification ensures that the software conforms to its specifications. In other words, it checks that the product is being built correctly according to the requirements. Validation, on the other hand, assesses whether the software meets the user's actual needs and expectations. It checks that the right product is being built—one that will be fit for its intended purpose when delivered.
Verification checks that specifications are being adhered to.
- Answers the question, are we building the product right?
Validation checks fitness for purpose.
- Answers the question, are we building the right product?
Focus
The focus of verification is on the intrinsic quality of the software artifacts themselves, such as the requirements documents, design specifications, code, and other deliverables. It examines these artifacts in detail to ensure they are complete, consistent, and adhere to applicable standards. Validation, in contrast, is concerned with the extrinsic quality of the software—how well it actually performs in meeting the user's needs. The focus here is on the user's experience when interacting with the software.
Verification focuses on the software itself, checking the intrinsic quality of the artifacts.
Validation focuses on the user's experience and the extrinsic quality of the software.
Timing
Another key difference between verification and validation is when they occur in the development life cycle. Verification activities can begin as soon as there are artifacts to review, which is often quite early in the project. Requirements documents and design specifications, for example, can be verified as soon as they are written. Validation, on the other hand, typically requires at least a partial working product. It is usually done later in the life cycle, when the software can be tested by real users or in a realistic environment.
Techniques
The techniques used for verification and validation also differ. Verification relies mainly on static techniques—that is, techniques that do not require the software to be executed. These include reviews, walkthroughs, and inspections, where artifacts are examined and discussed in detail. Validation, in contrast, relies more on dynamic techniques that involve actual execution of the software. The most prominent example is testing, especially user acceptance testing and beta testing, where real users work with the software to see if it meets their needs.
Tools and Techniques
Verification Tools and Techniques
Verification tools play a crucial role in ensuring that software meets the specified requirements and adheres to design and coding standards. These tools help identify issues early in the development process, reducing the cost and effort required to fix them later.
Our team uses several key verification tools:
- SonarCube and SonarCloud: These static code analysis tools automatically verify code quality and standards compliance, helping maintain a high level of code quality across the project.
- UML diagrams: We use UML diagrams to create and review software architectures, processes, and designs. These visual representations help ensure that the software design meets the specified requirements and follows established design patterns.
- Architecture Diagrams: These diagrams are used for planning and documenting code patterns and cloud infrastructure, ensuring that the software architecture is scalable, maintainable, and aligned with the project's goals.
- LINTing: We use various linting tools to check code quality, identify potential issues, and enforce coding standards across the project.
Validation Tools and Techniques
Validation tools ensure that the software meets the needs of the users and stakeholders. These tools help validate the software's functionality, usability, and performance in real-world scenarios.
Key validation tools and techniques include:
- Prototyping tools like InVision for creating lightweight product models to validate early designs with users.
- Integration and system testing tools like Selenium for validating that components work together to meet requirements.
Usability testing is another critical aspect of validation. Tools like UserTesting allow us to validate the user experience with real users, ensuring that the software is intuitive, easy to use, and meets the needs of the target audience.
Our QA team also makes extensive use of DevOps practices and tools to support the overall validation effort.
Real-World Scenarios
Scenario 1: Mobile App Development
Imagine a team building a mobile app for a retail company. They put a heavy emphasis on verification, with detailed requirements documents, thorough design reviews, rigorous code inspections using tools like SonarCube and LINTing, and extensive unit and integration testing.
However, they put less emphasis on validation. They do some light usability testing, but it's mostly an afterthought. When they launch, they start getting complaints that while the app doesn't crash, it's confusing and hard to use. Key user flows, like finding products and checking out, are not intuitive. As a result, user adoption is low and the app gets poor reviews.
The team was so focused on building the app right (verification) that they didn't put enough effort into making sure they were building the right app (validation). More prototyping, usability testing, and beta testing throughout the development process likely would have uncovered these issues earlier.
Scenario 2: Website Redesign
Now consider a team redesigning a company website. They take a balanced approach to verification and validation.
They start with requirements-gathering workshops to understand user needs. They create wireframes and clickable prototypes using tools like Sketch and InVision, and validate these with users to refine the design. They use tools like Azure DevOps to manage requirements and ensure traceability.
As they develop the site, they conduct code walkthroughs and inspections to verify code quality. They write unit and integration tests to verify functionality. But they also regularly conduct usability testing sessions with real users to validate that the site is intuitive and easy to use.
Before launch, they run an extensive beta testing program to validate the site with a wide range of real-world users. When they finally launch, the site is not only technically solid but also user-friendly, leading to increased engagement and conversions.
This team understood that verification and validation are equally important. By balancing the two throughout the development process, they created a website that was both well-engineered and well-suited to its users' needs.
Conclusion
Verification and validation are complementary processes that are both essential for software quality. Verification ensures that the product is built to specification, while validation ensures that the specification meets user needs. The most effective quality strategies involve continuous verification and validation throughout the development life cycle, using a mix of techniques and tools suited to each phase of the project.
In practice, this means techniques like requirements reviews, design walkthroughs, code inspections, unit testing, integration testing, usability testing, and beta testing, supported by tools for requirements management, static code analysis, test automation, user feedback collection, and more. By balancing verification and validation, and by leveraging the right tools and techniques at the right times, teams can deliver software that is not only technically sound but also truly fit for purpose.
Contact us today to discover how our services can help your business succeed. Our expert team provides tailored solutions to optimize your technology infrastructure, enhance productivity, and drive growth.
FAQ
What is the difference between test validation and verification?
Verification confirms that the software meets the specified requirements, while validation ensures that the software meets the customer's actual needs.
What is the difference between process verification and validation?
Process verification ensures that a process is performing as intended and consistently produces the expected results. Process validation, on the other hand, is the documented evidence that a process consistently produces a result or product that meets predetermined specifications and quality attributes.
What is verification and validation in API testing?
In API testing, verification ensures that the API meets the specified requirements and functions as intended. This includes checking for proper request and response formats, status codes, and data integrity. Validation, in the context of API testing, ensures that the API meets the end user's needs and integrates correctly with other systems or applications.
What is the difference between method verification and validation?
Method verification is the process of demonstrating that an analytical method is suitable for its intended purpose and provides reliable and consistent results. Method validation, on the other hand, is the process of confirming that a validated method performs as expected when used by a different laboratory or analyst.
What is the main difference between verification and validation in software testing?
In software testing, verification is the process of evaluating work-products (such as requirements, design, code, and tests) of a development phase to determine whether they meet the specified requirements for that phase. Validation, on the other hand, is the process of evaluating software during or at the end of the development process to determine whether it satisfies specified business requirements and user needs.
